The C(thulhu) Programming Language
Updated: 2010-01-30 13:48:11
And yet I saw them in a limitless stream– flopping, hopping, croaking, bleating– sorting themselves
For the past few months I’ve been thinking of starting this, plainly out of boredom, but it mi
Example: (complex, in principle only needed when you dive into C and are interested in pointers and
In my game the player can move blocks in four directions. While developing I used a printf() above t
: skip to main skip to sidebar On Software and Languages Speaking up from the Telco ghetto . on C++ , Java , Perl , Python , Haskell Erlang Systems and Processes Monday , 21 December 2009 Local language trends 2009 I just had a look on the statistics pages on our local IT freelancer website http : www.freelancermap.de and found the results pretty interesting . First let's have a look at the languages which are most popular in the freelance projects . The picture below shows the languages , the supply of programmers the blue bar and the demand in projects the red bar As it seems , here in Germany there are only two serious languages : C C++ and Java Well , ok , Visual Basic and C are sough after rather strongly red bars but there seems to be too little supply . Is that the fear of a vendor lock-in or is it just because Microsoft is considered evil that the programmers don't like NET The same case of too little supply for PHP but here I must mention that the hourly rates for PHP tend to be rather low PHP still considered a hacker language And now look at the last but one language with a longwinded German name I won't retype here too lazy In fact it's not a language of its own , but
: skip to main skip to sidebar On Software and Languages Speaking up from the Telco ghetto . on C++ , Java , Perl , Python , Haskell Erlang Systems and Processes Wednesday , 16 December 2009 Even more new C++ features Hi everybody As I had a look on the new C++ proposal the last time I found many small interesting things apart form the big , important features . But this was only a first look . Recently I had another look there and at the C++0x FAQ by Bjarne Stroustrup as well and discovered even more interesting crittures . So what did I miss 1. Some Syntax First of all the new function definition syntax Now I can write something like using PF double void along the lines of lambda function definition Well , that's definitely a treat , what a relief from typedef void PF double To be honest , I don't know if I've got the last one right , I have always to look thes syntax up or copy and paste from my other code The notation can be generally used to say to the compiler that the function type will be specified later Thusly we can write the following when usign embedded type like List : Link List : erase(Link l Link We postpone the return type definition utill we have entered the scope